Ok, on to the main attraction. Last week, I talked about how I wasn't a huge fan of a soda tax as a way to fight childhood obesity. So lets talk about what I am a fan of. I should start by saying, I don't think any one thing will be successful, it will take a comprehensive plan. But here are some key elements:
- Better health education about nutrition. We have to help parents and children understand what proper nutrition is and what it means to be appropriately physically active. I think this is one area in which public health has been a bit behind in the times. It's easy for people to be swayed by food advertising, the public health community has to do a better job getting the message out there. And it's got to be more than just about counting calories--portion sizes, healthy choices, healthier cooking methods, being active--all these things can be part of a comprehensive, culturally appropriate, health education campaign. This means it can't be a one-PSA across the whole country sort of thing, it needs to be tailored to particular audiences.
- Provide incentives for grocery stores to open in what are currently food deserts (areas that lack access to affordable, quality and nutritious food). Too often these food deserts coincide with low-income areas, which means that not only is there limited access to healthy options, these options are prohibitively expensive. As has been pointed out by many, obesity disproportionately affects low income people. If we're really going to solve this obesity problem, we have to give everyone an equal opportunity to access healthy nutritious food.
- Re-think the way we currently subsidize food. The way we currently subsidize food has made food cheaper, which is good, but it has tended to make unhealthy food the cheapest, which is bad. We should revisit these subsidies and figure out a way to subsidize fresh fruits and vegetables and drive the cost of these, and other healthy options, down. Again, that gives people a better opportunity to make healthy choices with a limited budget.
- Change how we build and maintain our communities. Why can't we make sure that we build more sidewalks so that people can walk safely in their neighborhood? And we need to ensure that our children have safe places to play and be active. There's a group here in Boston that has had some really good success in working within communities to empower youth to help clean up parks and make them safe places to be. Working within the community to make changes will be an important part of being successful.
Finally, because I don't want to be accused of hiding information, a study came out recently which showed that taxing unhealthy food was more effective than subsidizing healthy food. I haven't had a chance to read the whole study, but it is interesting and certainly seems to support what some of you all were saying about a soda tax. However, I still think that if you don't have access to healthy food, then taxing unhealthy food only makes it all cost more. I'd rather go the method of improving access and empowering individuals to make healthy choices.
As always, please share your thoughts! And remember, as part of my marathon training, I'm raising money to support research to fight childhood obesity and solve these important problems. I'd appreciate your support, you can make a contribution at: http://www.tuftsmarathonchallenge.com/runners/miriamst.
4 comments:
Again, I think you've written some really interesting ideas. I'm overwhelmed with dissertation work these days, but I thought I'd call attention to some interesting articles from the current issue of Health Affairs: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/vol29/issue3/
(the whole issue is actually on childhood obesity).
A few most interesting papers:
-Federal Food Policy And Childhood Obesity: A Solution Or Part Of The Problem?
Rachel Tolbert Kimbro and Elizabeth Rigby
-Childhood Obesity: The New Tobacco
Jonathan D. Klein and William Dietz
-The Economics Of Childhood Obesity
John Cawley
-Reducing Childhood Obesity Through Policy Change: Acting Now To Prevent Obesity
Thomas R. Frieden, William Dietz, and Janet Collins
Thanks Rachel! I'll have to check out those articles.
I was really surprised that taxing unhealthy food would be more effective than subsidizing healthy food. This makes your point about education really important. I guess the next would and this is a quesion for Rachel (Ms. PHD) as well, what kind of policy should the government pursue? and what are the best avenues to educates kids and parents about food and food choices?
What I thought was interesting about the study is that people did buy the healthy food when it was subsidized...but then they used the extra money they had saved to also buy unhealthy food. So while the subsidies worked to a certain extent, because people bought the healthy food, the overall amount of calories they bought (which is how the researchers measured the effect) was higher than when unhealthy food was taxed.
So yeah, I think education is important, and effective communication is perhaps an area where public health has struggled in the past.
Post a Comment